Twenty-year trends in treatment at the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit University Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia

    Authors

    Keywords

    cardiac intensive care unit, treatment, trends

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2023.302

    Full Text

    **Goal**: Determination of 20-year trends in demographic characteristics, frequencies of main and other diagnoses, risk factors, type and number of admissions, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) and hospital stay, employed therapeutic agents and procedures, as well as outcomes including mortality. **Patient and Methods**: Data from medical records and electronic hospital information system on all patients hospitalized in CICU University Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia during March 2003, March 2013 and March 2023 were investigated. Descriptive data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges or counts and frequencies. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, Kruskal-Wallis H test for continuous variables. Two-tailed significance tests were performed, and p<0.05 was considered significant. **Results**: In investigated period, a total of 304 patients were hospitalized in CICU, 64.8% were male, median age was 68 years (59-78). Number of admissions (74 vs. 87 vs. 143 per month), especially from referral hospitals (1.4 vs. 28.7 vs. 34.3%, p<0.01) and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (6.8 vs. 31.0 vs. 28.7%, p<0.01) increased over time. Use of echocardiography, mostly bedside, increased (33.9 vs. 56.5 vs. 65.7%, p<0.01), as well as utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (35.6 vs. 61.2 vs. 67.8%, p<0.01). The use of drugs depended on contemporary international guidelines and drug availability (eptifibatide 0.0 vs. 10.6 vs. 7.0%, p<0.05, LWMH 11.9 vs. 69.6 vs. 72.0%, p<0.01). For antibiotics (3.4 vs. 18.8 vs. 22.9%, p<0.01), an increase followed the frequency of infections. Median time CICU (59 vs. 43 vs. 22 hours, p<0.01) and in-hospital stay (10 vs. 7 vs. 3 days, p<0.01) decreased during investigated period (**Figure 1** and **2**Figure 2), similar to mortality (9.5 vs. 5.7 vs 2.8%, p<0.01). FIGURE 1. Trends in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit length of stay over time. 1 – MARCH 2003; 2 – MARCH 2013; 3 – MARCH 2023; CICU – CARDIAC INTENSIVE CARE UNIt FIGURE 2. Trends in hospital length of stay of Cardiac Intensive Care Unit patients over time. 1 – MARCH 2003; 2 – MARCH 2013; 3 – MARCH 2023 **Conclusion**: The results indicate an increasing trend in the number of patients hospitalized in the CICU (especially those with STEMI) with a shortening of stay, and a decrease in mortality. The number of patients who underwent echocardiographic diagnostics and PCI, as well as those treated with antibiotics, increased. As for trends in the use of mechanical circulatory and respiratory support, and continuous renal replacement therapy, a larger number of examined patients is required to reach statistical significance. (1-3)

    Literature

    1. Cook DJ, Webb S, Proudfoot A. Assessment and management of cardiovascular disease in the intensive care unit. Heart. 2022 March;108(5):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315568
    2. Claeys MJ, Roubille F, Casella G, Zukermann R, Nikolaou N, De Luca L, et al. Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 December;9(8):993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872619883997
    3. Bonnefoy-Cudraz E, Bueno H, Casella G, De Maria E, Fitzsimons D, Halvorsen S, et al. Editor’s Choice - Acute Cardiovascular Care Association Position Paper on Intensive Cardiovascular Care Units: An update on their definition, structure, organisation and function. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 February;7(1):80–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617724269
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Twenty-year trends in treatment at the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit University Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages302-303
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2023.302
    cardiac intensive care unit
    treatment
    trends

    Authors

    Zdravko Babić*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia
    Krešimir CrljenkoORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia
    Dorijan BabićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Marin PavlovORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: zbabic67@gmail.com

    Full Text

    Goal: Determination of 20-year trends in demographic characteristics, frequencies of main and other diagnoses, risk factors, type and number of admissions, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) and hospital stay, employed therapeutic agents and procedures, as well as outcomes including mortality.

    Patient and Methods: Data from medical records and electronic hospital information system on all patients hospitalized in CICU University Hospital Centre „Sestre milosrdnice“, Zagreb, Croatia during March 2003, March 2013 and March 2023 were investigated. Descriptive data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges or counts and frequencies. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables, Kruskal-Wallis H test for continuous variables. Two-tailed significance tests were performed, and p<0.05 was considered significant.

    Results: In investigated period, a total of 304 patients were hospitalized in CICU, 64.8% were male, median age was 68 years (59–78). Number of admissions (74 vs. 87 vs. 143 per month), especially from referral hospitals (1.4 vs. 28.7 vs. 34.3%, p<0.01) and patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (6.8 vs. 31.0 vs. 28.7%, p<0.01) increased over time. Use of echocardiography, mostly bedside, increased (33.9 vs. 56.5 vs. 65.7%, p<0.01), as well as utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (35.6 vs. 61.2 vs. 67.8%, p<0.01). The use of drugs depended on contemporary international guidelines and drug availability (eptifibatide 0.0 vs. 10.6 vs. 7.0%, p<0.05, LWMH 11.9 vs. 69.6 vs. 72.0%, p<0.01). For antibiotics (3.4 vs. 18.8 vs. 22.9%, p<0.01), an increase followed the frequency of infections. Median time CICU (59 vs. 43 vs. 22 hours, p<0.01) and in-hospital stay (10 vs. 7 vs. 3 days, p<0.01) decreased during investigated period (Figure 1 and 2Figure 2), similar to mortality (9.5 vs. 5.7 vs 2.8%, p<0.01).

    FIGURE 1. Trends in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit length of stay over time. 1 – MARCH 2003; 2 – MARCH 2013; 3 – MARCH 2023; CICU – CARDIAC INTENSIVE CARE UNIt

    FIGURE 2. Trends in hospital length of stay of Cardiac Intensive Care Unit patients over time. 1 – MARCH 2003; 2 – MARCH 2013; 3 – MARCH 2023

    Conclusion: The results indicate an increasing trend in the number of patients hospitalized in the CICU (especially those with STEMI) with a shortening of stay, and a decrease in mortality. The number of patients who underwent echocardiographic diagnostics and PCI, as well as those treated with antibiotics, increased. As for trends in the use of mechanical circulatory and respiratory support, and continuous renal replacement therapy, a larger number of examined patients is required to reach statistical significance. (1–3)

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Cook DJ, Webb S, Proudfoot A. Assessment and management of cardiovascular disease in the intensive care unit. Heart. 2022 March;108(5):397–405.DOI
    2. 2.
      Claeys MJ, Roubille F, Casella G, Zukermann R, Nikolaou N, De Luca L, et al. Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 December;9(8):993–1001.DOI
    3. 3.
      Bonnefoy-Cudraz E, Bueno H, Casella G, De Maria E, Fitzsimons D, Halvorsen S, et al. Editor’s Choice - Acute Cardiovascular Care Association Position Paper on Intensive Cardiovascular Care Units: An update on their definition, structure, organisation and function. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 February;7(1):80–95.DOI