The severity of lower extremity artery disease is associated with arterial stiffness parameters measured on the carotid artery

    Authors

    Keywords

    lower extremity artery disease, carotid stiffness

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.384

    Full Text

    Background : Previous studies have found interaction between lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) and systemic vascular effects. ( 1 - 3 ) Little is known about association of LEAD and carotid artery stiffness (AS). The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between carotid stiffness parameters, intima- media thickness (IMT) and severity of LEAD. Patients and Methods : Cross-sectional study of 120 patients with LEAD was performed (mean age 64.6 ± 8.6 years, 85 males, mean ABI 0.65 ± 0.15). The diagnosis of LEAD was defined as ABI ≤ 0.9. Patients were divided into two groups: mild LEAD (ABI from 0.9 to 0.71) and advanced LEAD (ABI ≤ 0.7). Local stiffness ß index, one-point pulse wave velocity (PWV-ß), elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), augmentation index (AI) and IMT were measured on common carotid artery by high-resolution ultrasonography and Echo-tracking technology. Patients with severe renal impairment and those with moderate and severe heart valve disease or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 40%) were excluded from this study. Results : Out of 120 patients, 39 had mild LEAD (mean ABI 0.81 ± 0.07) and 81 had advanced LEAD (mean ABI 0.57 ± 0.11). Symptomatic LEAD was significantly more frequent in patients with advanced LEAD (59% vs. 93.8%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in demographic and laboratory findings (age, gender, body mass index, history of diabetes, smoking, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, fasting blood glucose, serum creatinine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol). Three arterial stiffness parameters: ß index, PWV-ß and Ep, were significantly higher in advanced forms of LEAD (ß index median: 8.1, interquartile range (IQR) [6.7-10.0] vs. 9.4 [7.9-11.1], p= 0.008; PWV-ß median: 6.4, IQR [5.9-7.2] vs. 6.9 [6.3-7.5] m/s, p =0.031; Ep median: 112, IQR [89-139] vs. 127 [107-154] kPa, p= 0.025). Augmentation index, arterial compliance and IMT did not significantly differ between groups (p= 0.862, p= 0.434 and p=0.060, respectively). Conclusion : In comparison with mild LEAD, patients with advanced forms of LEAD have higher carotid stiffness parameters (ß index, PWV-ß and Ep). Further studies are needed to assess the clinical importance of arterial stiffness in LEAD, targeting AS for potential therapies in order to improve management of LEAD.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    The severity of lower extremity artery disease is associated with arterial stiffness parameters measured on the carotid artery

    Extended Abstract
    Issue9-10
    Published
    Pages384
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.384
    lower extremity artery disease
    carotid stiffness

    Authors

    Majda Vrkić Kirhmajer*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ljiljana BanfićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Eduard MargetićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Irena Ivanac VranešićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Milan MiloševićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

    Full Text

    Background : Previous studies have found interaction between lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) and systemic vascular effects. ( 1 - 3 ) Little is known about association of LEAD and carotid artery stiffness (AS). The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between carotid stiffness parameters, intima- media thickness (IMT) and severity of LEAD. Patients and Methods : Cross-sectional study of 120 patients with LEAD was performed (mean age 64.6 ± 8.6 years, 85 males, mean ABI 0.65 ± 0.15). The diagnosis of LEAD was defined as ABI ≤ 0.9. Patients were divided into two groups: mild LEAD (ABI from 0.9 to 0.71) and advanced LEAD (ABI ≤ 0.7). Local stiffness ß index, one-point pulse wave velocity (PWV-ß), elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), augmentation index (AI) and IMT were measured on common carotid artery by high-resolution ultrasonography and Echo-tracking technology. Patients with severe renal impairment and those with moderate and severe heart valve disease or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< 40%) were excluded from this study. Results : Out of 120 patients, 39 had mild LEAD (mean ABI 0.81 ± 0.07) and 81 had advanced LEAD (mean ABI 0.57 ± 0.11). Symptomatic LEAD was significantly more frequent in patients with advanced LEAD (59% vs. 93.8%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in demographic and laboratory findings (age, gender, body mass index, history of diabetes, smoking, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, fasting blood glucose, serum creatinine, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol). Three arterial stiffness parameters: ß index, PWV-ß and Ep, were significantly higher in advanced forms of LEAD (ß index median: 8.1, interquartile range (IQR) [6.7-10.0] vs. 9.4 [7.9-11.1], p= 0.008; PWV-ß median: 6.4, IQR [5.9-7.2] vs. 6.9 [6.3-7.5] m/s, p =0.031; Ep median: 112, IQR [89-139] vs. 127 [107-154] kPa, p= 0.025). Augmentation index, arterial compliance and IMT did not significantly differ between groups (p= 0.862, p= 0.434 and p=0.060, respectively). Conclusion : In comparison with mild LEAD, patients with advanced forms of LEAD have higher carotid stiffness parameters (ß index, PWV-ß and Ep). Further studies are needed to assess the clinical importance of arterial stiffness in LEAD, targeting AS for potential therapies in order to improve management of LEAD.