The efficiency of electrocardioversion-induced rhythm restoration performed in University Clinical Center Tuzla

    Authors

    Abstract

    **Background:** Atrial fibrillation, as the most common type of arrhythmia, affects 1-2% of general population. Currently more than 6 million Europeans are experiencing this condition, since the average age of population is increasing, and it is expected that this number will rise in next 50 years by 250%. Atrial fibrillation usually leaves lasting consequences on patients overall health. Preventing them is the main therapeutic goal. (1-3) The main objective of this study was to inspect the efficiency of sinus rhythm restoration by means of electrocardioversion. Hemodynamically unstable patients (suffering from angina pectoris or hypertension), unresponsive to resuscitation, are subjected to emergency electrocardioversion. On the other hand, stable patients should undergo electrocardioversion procedure after three week long anticoagulant treatment with warfarin. Patients should continue taking warfarin for four weeks after the procedure in sake of blood clot forming prevention. **Case report:** From January 2017 to September 2018, 58 elective cardioversion cases were done by the Intensive Therapy Unit of the University Clinical Center of Tuzla, 12 of which were atrial flutter patients, while 40 patients had atrial fibrillation. From those 40 cases of atrial fibrillation, 6 patients underwent two cardioversion treatments using 150 J of energy, followed by single 200 J treatment. In 50 cases patients were brought back to sinus rhythm straightaway after the first treatment. **Conclusion:** Although efficiency rate is high (96%), qualified personnel and suitable equipment remain the most important requirements for successful and safe electrocardioversion. In long-term fibrillation, success rate of electrocardioversion and sinus rhythm perseverance decreases over time, especially if it lasts for more than a year. In that case, monitoring of the heart rate and anticoagulative therapy should be minded.

    Keywords

    atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, elective electrocardioversion

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2018.319

    Literature

    1. Hindricks G, Willems S, Kautzner J, De Chillou C, Wiedemann M, Schepel S, et al. EuroFlutter Investigators. Effect of electroanatomically guided versus conventional catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter on the fluoroscopy time and resource use: a prospective randomized multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jul;20(7):734–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01439.x
    2. Savelieva I, Camm J. Update on atrial fibrillation: part I. Clin Cardiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20138
    3. Weerasooriya R, Jaïs P, Le Heuzey JY, Scaveé C, Choi KJ, Macle L, et al. Cost analysis of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):292–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00035.x
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    The efficiency of electrocardioversion-induced rhythm restoration performed in University Clinical Center Tuzla

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages319
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2018.319
    atrial fibrillation
    anticoagulant therapy
    elective electrocardioversion

    Authors

    Emir Becirovic*ORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Ammar BrkicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Esad BrkicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Amira KusljugicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Edita SijercicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Hazim TulumovicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Denis MrsicORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Daniela LoncarORCIDUniversity Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    *Correspondence email: becirovic.emil@live.com

    Abstract

    **Background:** Atrial fibrillation, as the most common type of arrhythmia, affects 1-2% of general population. Currently more than 6 million Europeans are experiencing this condition, since the average age of population is increasing, and it is expected that this number will rise in next 50 years by 250%. Atrial fibrillation usually leaves lasting consequences on patients overall health. Preventing them is the main therapeutic goal. (1-3) The main objective of this study was to inspect the efficiency of sinus rhythm restoration by means of electrocardioversion. Hemodynamically unstable patients (suffering from angina pectoris or hypertension), unresponsive to resuscitation, are subjected to emergency electrocardioversion. On the other hand, stable patients should undergo electrocardioversion procedure after three week long anticoagulant treatment with warfarin. Patients should continue taking warfarin for four weeks after the procedure in sake of blood clot forming prevention. **Case report:** From January 2017 to September 2018, 58 elective cardioversion cases were done by the Intensive Therapy Unit of the University Clinical Center of Tuzla, 12 of which were atrial flutter patients, while 40 patients had atrial fibrillation. From those 40 cases of atrial fibrillation, 6 patients underwent two cardioversion treatments using 150 J of energy, followed by single 200 J treatment. In 50 cases patients were brought back to sinus rhythm straightaway after the first treatment. **Conclusion:** Although efficiency rate is high (96%), qualified personnel and suitable equipment remain the most important requirements for successful and safe electrocardioversion. In long-term fibrillation, success rate of electrocardioversion and sinus rhythm perseverance decreases over time, especially if it lasts for more than a year. In that case, monitoring of the heart rate and anticoagulative therapy should be minded.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Hindricks G, Willems S, Kautzner J, De Chillou C, Wiedemann M, Schepel S, et al. EuroFlutter Investigators. Effect of electroanatomically guided versus conventional catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter on the fluoroscopy time and resource use: a prospective randomized multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jul;20(7):734–40.DOI
    2. 2.
      Savelieva I, Camm J. Update on atrial fibrillation: part I. Clin Cardiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):55–62.DOI
    3. 3.
      Weerasooriya R, Jaïs P, Le Heuzey JY, Scaveé C, Choi KJ, Macle L, et al. Cost analysis of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):292–4.DOI