Systemic thrombolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

    Authors

    Abstract

    Pulmonary embolism remains the one of the commonest cardiovascular disease, the severity of which is variable and can be lethal. The incidence is expected to increase due to the aging population. Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism is characterized by hemodynamical stability, but elevated mortality risk and both radiographic and laboratory signs of right heart strain. Thrombolysis remains a possible life saving treatment option but bears an increased risk of potentially life-threatening hemorrhage. Optimal treatment is still not established. (1-3) We present a series of intermediate-high risk patients treated in our hospital with thrombolytic therapy (n=4, 2 male, median age 58.5) and compare relevant direct and indirect values of right ventricular load before and after treatment (**Table 1**). We also provide a summary of our clinical approach in light of current guidelines and two meta-analyses. ### TABLE 1: Comparison of relevant direct and indirect values of right ventricular load before and after treatment. | **Before treatment** | **Before treatment** | **Before treatment** | **After treatment** | **After treatment** | **After treatment** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **SO2 (%)** | **TnI (ng/L)** | **NTproBNP (ng/L)** | **SO2 (%)** | **TnI (ng/L)** | **NTproBNP (ng/L)** | | 80 | 657 | 6103 | 98 | 35 | 83 | | 82 | 61 | 3522 | 92 | <10 | 145 | | 84 | 190 | 9122 | 97 | 262 | 2976 | | 94 | 125 | 2597 | 96 | <10 | 139 |

    Keywords

    pulmonary embolism, thrombolytic therapy

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2022.292

    Literature

    1. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020 January 21;41(4):543–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405
    2. Chatterjee S, Chakraborty A, Weinberg I, Kadakia M, Wilensky RL, Sardar P, et al. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014 June 18;311(23):2414–21. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5990
    3. Zuo Z, Yue J, Dong BR, Wu T, Liu GJ, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 April 15;4(4):CD004437. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004437.pub6
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Systemic thrombolytic therapy in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism

    Extended Abstract
    Issue9-10
    Published
    Pages292
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2022.292
    pulmonary embolism
    thrombolytic therapy

    Authors

    Karlo Golubić*ORCIDSestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
    Nikola KosORCIDSestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
    Tonći BatinićORCIDSestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
    Mislav VrsalovićORCIDSestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: karlo.golubic@kbcsm.hr

    Abstract

    Pulmonary embolism remains the one of the commonest cardiovascular disease, the severity of which is variable and can be lethal. The incidence is expected to increase due to the aging population. Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism is characterized by hemodynamical stability, but elevated mortality risk and both radiographic and laboratory signs of right heart strain. Thrombolysis remains a possible life saving treatment option but bears an increased risk of potentially life-threatening hemorrhage. Optimal treatment is still not established. (1-3) We present a series of intermediate-high risk patients treated in our hospital with thrombolytic therapy (n=4, 2 male, median age 58.5) and compare relevant direct and indirect values of right ventricular load before and after treatment (**Table 1**). We also provide a summary of our clinical approach in light of current guidelines and two meta-analyses. ### TABLE 1: Comparison of relevant direct and indirect values of right ventricular load before and after treatment. | **Before treatment** | **Before treatment** | **Before treatment** | **After treatment** | **After treatment** | **After treatment** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | **SO2 (%)** | **TnI (ng/L)** | **NTproBNP (ng/L)** | **SO2 (%)** | **TnI (ng/L)** | **NTproBNP (ng/L)** | | 80 | 657 | 6103 | 98 | 35 | 83 | | 82 | 61 | 3522 | 92 | <10 | 145 | | 84 | 190 | 9122 | 97 | 262 | 2976 | | 94 | 125 | 2597 | 96 | <10 | 139 |

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, Bueno H, Geersing GJ, Harjola VP, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2020 January 21;41(4):543–603.DOI
    2. 2.
      Chatterjee S, Chakraborty A, Weinberg I, Kadakia M, Wilensky RL, Sardar P, et al. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014 June 18;311(23):2414–21.DOI
    3. 3.
      Zuo Z, Yue J, Dong BR, Wu T, Liu GJ, et al. Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 April 15;4(4):CD004437.DOI