Successful cardiac resynchronization therapy in a young patient with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy: a case report

    Authors

    Keywords

    left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy, resynchronisation

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2018.357

    Full Text

    Background : Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNCC) can be associated with left ventricle (LV) dilation or hypertrophy, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, or both. ( 1 ) Heart failure (HF) symptoms and presentations vary, and some patients may be asymptomatic. Affected individuals are at risk of left and/or right ventricular HF, embolization and malignant arrhythmias when device implantation is necessary. One study showed that LVNCC patients showed better response to resynchronization therapy. Case presentation : 36-year-old previously healthy male was admitted because of acute left ventricular failure in NYHA III/IV class. ECG showed left bundle branch block with QRS duration of 168 ms. Bedside echocardiography revealed a dilated LV (71 mm in end-diastole) with estimated ejection fraction (EF) of 26%, moderate mitral regurgitation, moderate left atrial enlargement, moderate pulmonary hypertension with indirect signs of preserved right ventricular function. Standard therapy with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and prophylactic dose of enoxaparine was introduced. After initial recompenzation he suffered from an acute embolization of the right superficial femoral artery. Successful embolectomy was performed and therapeutic doses of enoxaparine were introduced with warfarin overlap. Control echocardiography revealed no residual thrombi in the LV, that showed trabeculization, but without clear echocardiographic criteria for LVNCC. Warfarin was titrated to optimal INR value, and after optimization of medical therapy he was discharged in NYHA II class and scheduled for MSCT coronary angiography and cardiac MR. Ischemic heart disease was excluded and cardiac MR confirmed LVNCC with EF of 24%. He was scheduled for CRT-D implantation under warfarin in therapeutic range. All three electrodes were implanted with optimal sensing and stimulation values and during resynchronization he had high R wave in V1 and V2 lead, with echocardiographic signs of a super-responder. After 9 months of follow-up he was in NYHA I class without loop-diuretics, and with 100% successful biventricular pacing and no ventricular ectopy detected after introduction of sacubitril/valsartan. Conclusion : Patients with LVNCC and appropriate criteria appear to be great responders to resynchronization with chances of optimal reverse remodeling.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Successful cardiac resynchronization therapy in a young patient with left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy: a case report

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages357
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2018.357
    left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy
    resynchronisation

    Authors

    Irzal Hadžibegović*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ante LisičićORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Petra VitlovORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Boris StarčevićORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia

    Full Text

    Background : Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNCC) can be associated with left ventricle (LV) dilation or hypertrophy, systolic or diastolic dysfunction, or both. ( 1 ) Heart failure (HF) symptoms and presentations vary, and some patients may be asymptomatic. Affected individuals are at risk of left and/or right ventricular HF, embolization and malignant arrhythmias when device implantation is necessary. One study showed that LVNCC patients showed better response to resynchronization therapy. Case presentation : 36-year-old previously healthy male was admitted because of acute left ventricular failure in NYHA III/IV class. ECG showed left bundle branch block with QRS duration of 168 ms. Bedside echocardiography revealed a dilated LV (71 mm in end-diastole) with estimated ejection fraction (EF) of 26%, moderate mitral regurgitation, moderate left atrial enlargement, moderate pulmonary hypertension with indirect signs of preserved right ventricular function. Standard therapy with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and prophylactic dose of enoxaparine was introduced. After initial recompenzation he suffered from an acute embolization of the right superficial femoral artery. Successful embolectomy was performed and therapeutic doses of enoxaparine were introduced with warfarin overlap. Control echocardiography revealed no residual thrombi in the LV, that showed trabeculization, but without clear echocardiographic criteria for LVNCC. Warfarin was titrated to optimal INR value, and after optimization of medical therapy he was discharged in NYHA II class and scheduled for MSCT coronary angiography and cardiac MR. Ischemic heart disease was excluded and cardiac MR confirmed LVNCC with EF of 24%. He was scheduled for CRT-D implantation under warfarin in therapeutic range. All three electrodes were implanted with optimal sensing and stimulation values and during resynchronization he had high R wave in V1 and V2 lead, with echocardiographic signs of a super-responder. After 9 months of follow-up he was in NYHA I class without loop-diuretics, and with 100% successful biventricular pacing and no ventricular ectopy detected after introduction of sacubitril/valsartan. Conclusion : Patients with LVNCC and appropriate criteria appear to be great responders to resynchronization with chances of optimal reverse remodeling.