Substrate-based ablation of idiopathic atypical atrial flutter: a case report

    Authors

    Keywords

    atypical atrial flutter, catheter ablation, substrate ablation

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.131

    Full Text

    Introduction : Atypical atrial flutter usually occurs in the setting of prior ablation or cardiac surgery where iatrogenic scares serve as the electrophysiologic substrate for re-entry. Idiopathic atypical atrial flutter is an uncommon variant. Whether the standard anatomical or substrate ablation approach is the best treatment option for this type of arrhythmia remains a debate ( 1 , 2 ). Case report : A middle-aged female patient with a history of ischemic heart disease and percutaneous coronary intervention, ICD implantation for secondary prevention, and no prior history of atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, or ablation presented with new onset persistent atrial flutter ( Figure 1 ). An electrophysiology study was conducted with entrainment suggesting atypical atrial flutter from the left atrium. 3-dimensional mapping of the left atrium using the Carto 3 system and multipolar catheter (Biosense Webster) was performed, showing a scar with the zone of slow conduction (critical isthmus) on the anterior wall near the roof and the left superior pulmonary vein ( Figure 2 ). Ablation of critical isthmus terminated tachycardia ( Figure 3 ). A few additional lesions for substrate ablation were applied avoiding linear anatomical lines. After ablation, tachycardia was non-inducible. 12-lead electrocardiogram showing atrial flutter on admission. Coherent mapping of the left atrium with a zone of slow conduction and critical isthmus (black circle) for atypical flutter. Termination of tachycardia during critical isthmus ablation (green arow on the left part and the red circle on the right part of the picture). Conclusion : There are still no clear recommendations regarding ablation of atypical atrial flutter and our case highlights the need for an individual approach when considering between anatomical or substrate ablation approaches, thus potentially avoiding excessive ablation lines.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Substrate-based ablation of idiopathic atypical atrial flutter: a case report

    Extended Abstract
    Issue3-4
    Published
    Pages131-132
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.131
    atypical atrial flutter
    catheter ablation
    substrate ablation

    Authors

    Vito Mustapić*ORCIDMagdalena Clinic for Cardiovascular Disease, Krapinske Toplice, at Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia
    Janko Szavits NossanORCIDMagdalena Clinic for Cardiovascular Disease, Krapinske Toplice, at Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia
    Lucija BarbarićORCIDMagdalena Clinic for Cardiovascular Disease, Krapinske Toplice, at Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia
    Karlo RegvarORCIDMagdalena Clinic for Cardiovascular Disease, Krapinske Toplice, at Faculty of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia
    Iva KopčićORCIDBiosense webster, Johnson & Johnson S.E., d.o.o., Zagreb, Croatia
    Šimun JurišićORCIDBiosense webster, Johnson & Johnson S.E., d.o.o., Zagreb, Croatia

    Full Text

    Introduction : Atypical atrial flutter usually occurs in the setting of prior ablation or cardiac surgery where iatrogenic scares serve as the electrophysiologic substrate for re-entry. Idiopathic atypical atrial flutter is an uncommon variant. Whether the standard anatomical or substrate ablation approach is the best treatment option for this type of arrhythmia remains a debate ( 1 , 2 ). Case report : A middle-aged female patient with a history of ischemic heart disease and percutaneous coronary intervention, ICD implantation for secondary prevention, and no prior history of atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, or ablation presented with new onset persistent atrial flutter ( Figure 1 ). An electrophysiology study was conducted with entrainment suggesting atypical atrial flutter from the left atrium. 3-dimensional mapping of the left atrium using the Carto 3 system and multipolar catheter (Biosense Webster) was performed, showing a scar with the zone of slow conduction (critical isthmus) on the anterior wall near the roof and the left superior pulmonary vein ( Figure 2 ). Ablation of critical isthmus terminated tachycardia ( Figure 3 ). A few additional lesions for substrate ablation were applied avoiding linear anatomical lines. After ablation, tachycardia was non-inducible. 12-lead electrocardiogram showing atrial flutter on admission. Coherent mapping of the left atrium with a zone of slow conduction and critical isthmus (black circle) for atypical flutter. Termination of tachycardia during critical isthmus ablation (green arow on the left part and the red circle on the right part of the picture). Conclusion : There are still no clear recommendations regarding ablation of atypical atrial flutter and our case highlights the need for an individual approach when considering between anatomical or substrate ablation approaches, thus potentially avoiding excessive ablation lines.