SARS-CoV-2 related fulminant myocarditis: successful management with Impella CP mechanical circulatory support

    Authors

    Keywords

    myocarditis, mechanical circulatory support, COVID-19

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.551

    Full Text

    **Introduction:** Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a severe and rapidly progressive cardiac inflammatory disease with high mortality rates. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has significantly improved survival outcomes, but there are only a few cases of successful recovery with Impella CP support (1). Here, we report a case of SARS-CoV-2-related FM managed with Impella CP. **Case report:** 41-year-old female with a history of scleroderma tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 four days before admission. Immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued immediately, and treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was initiated but stopped two days later due to side effects. On the fourth day of symptoms, she was admitted due to elevated troponin I (TnI) and a reduced ejection fraction (EF of 45%) on echocardiography (echo). She received pulse corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins along with heart failure therapy. On the fifth day, she was transferred to University Hospital Center Zagreb due to cardiogenic shock. Initial laboratory findings showed severely elevated NT-proBNP (30,662 ng/L) and TnI (3,508.3 ng/L), while CRP was normal (2.6 mg/L). Her lactate levels were elevated at 9 mmol/L. The echo showed EF of 20% and mildly reduced right ventricular (RV) function. Initially, she was stabilized with inotropes—dobutamine (10 mcg/kg/min) and milrinone (0.5 mcg/kg/min)—but two days later, Impella CP was implanted due to the progression of shock. The position of Impella CP on echo is shown in **Figure 1**. With Impella CP support, her condition improved, and subsequent echo showed signs of recovery in systolic function. Eight days later, she was successfully weaned off Impella CP support. Control echo before discharge showed an EF of 63% and normal RV function. Magnetic resonance imaging also revealed a recovered EF of 60%, with diffuse myocardial edema consistent with the diagnosis of FM. Complete laboratory findings on admission and discharge are shown in **Table 1**. The patient was discharged home after 18 days. She remained on heart failure treatment, including valsartan, bisoprolol, and eplerenone, for six months following FM. FIGURE 1. Echocardiography, parasternal long axis, showing Impella CP position and small pericardial effusion. ### TABLE 1: Laboratory findings on admission and discharge. | | **Admission** | **Discharge** | **Reference interval** | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Hemoglobin (g/L) | 142 | 85 | 119 – 157 | | Leukocytes (x109/L) | 7.6 | 8.3 | 3.4 - 9.7 | | Neutrophils (x109/L) | 6.70 | 7.5 | 2.06 - 6.49 | | Lymphocytes (x109/L) | 0.73 | 0.49 | 1.19 - 3.35 | | Platelets (x109/L) | 158 | 228 | 158 – 424 | | BUN (mmol/L) | 5.8 | 7.1 | 2.8 - 8.3 | | Creatinine (µmol/L) | 58 | 56 | 49 – 90 | | ALT (U/L) | 99 | 88 | 10 – 36 | | GGT (U/L) | 145 | 151 | 9 – 35 | | CRP (mg/) | 2.6 | <1 | < 5 | | Troponin I (ng/L) | 3508.3 | 58 | 0 – 15.6 | | NT-proBNP (ng/L) | 30662 | 2714 | <125.0 | [†] BUN = blood urea nitrogen; ALT = alanine transaminase; GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase; CRP = c-reactive protein; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide. **Conclusion:** Although FM has historically high mortality rates, MCS can be associated with promising results. We described a case of SARS-CoV-2-related FM with full recovery managed solely with Impella CP support, which provides significantly less support than the more commonly used venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenationor (VA ECMO) or Impella 5.5.

    Literature

    1. Tschöpe C, Van Linthout S, Klein O, Mairinger T, Krackhardt F, Potapov EV, et al. Mechanical Unloading by Fulminant Myocarditis: LV-IMPELLA, ECMELLA, BI-PELLA, and PROPELLA Concepts. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 April;12(2):116–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-018-9820-2
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    SARS-CoV-2 related fulminant myocarditis: successful management with Impella CP mechanical circulatory support

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages551-552
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.551
    myocarditis
    mechanical circulatory support
    COVID-19

    Authors

    Lucija GrbićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Dubravka Šipuš*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Luka PerčinORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Dora FabijanovićORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Marijan PašalićORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Hrvoje JurinORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivo PlanincORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Jure SamardžićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Maja Čikeš VodušekORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Boško SkorićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Davor MiličićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Daniel LovrićORCIDUniversity Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: dubravka.sipus@gmail.com

    Full Text

    Introduction: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a severe and rapidly progressive cardiac inflammatory disease with high mortality rates. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has significantly improved survival outcomes, but there are only a few cases of successful recovery with Impella CP support (1). Here, we report a case of SARS-CoV-2-related FM managed with Impella CP.

    Case report: 41-year-old female with a history of scleroderma tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 four days before admission. Immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued immediately, and treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was initiated but stopped two days later due to side effects. On the fourth day of symptoms, she was admitted due to elevated troponin I (TnI) and a reduced ejection fraction (EF of 45%) on echocardiography (echo). She received pulse corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins along with heart failure therapy. On the fifth day, she was transferred to University Hospital Center Zagreb due to cardiogenic shock. Initial laboratory findings showed severely elevated NT-proBNP (30,662 ng/L) and TnI (3,508.3 ng/L), while CRP was normal (2.6 mg/L). Her lactate levels were elevated at 9 mmol/L. The echo showed EF of 20% and mildly reduced right ventricular (RV) function. Initially, she was stabilized with inotropes—dobutamine (10 mcg/kg/min) and milrinone (0.5 mcg/kg/min)—but two days later, Impella CP was implanted due to the progression of shock. The position of Impella CP on echo is shown in Figure 1. With Impella CP support, her condition improved, and subsequent echo showed signs of recovery in systolic function. Eight days later, she was successfully weaned off Impella CP support. Control echo before discharge showed an EF of 63% and normal RV function. Magnetic resonance imaging also revealed a recovered EF of 60%, with diffuse myocardial edema consistent with the diagnosis of FM. Complete laboratory findings on admission and discharge are shown in Table 1. The patient was discharged home after 18 days. She remained on heart failure treatment, including valsartan, bisoprolol, and eplerenone, for six months following FM.

    FIGURE 1. Echocardiography, parasternal long axis, showing Impella CP position and small pericardial effusion.

    TABLE 1: Laboratory findings on admission and discharge.

    Hemoglobin (g/L)
    Admission
    142
    Discharge
    85
    Reference interval
    119 – 157
    Leukocytes (x109/L)
    Admission
    7.6
    Discharge
    8.3
    Reference interval
    3.4• 9.7
    Neutrophils (x109/L)
    Admission
    6.70
    Discharge
    7.5
    Reference interval
    2.06• 6.49
    Lymphocytes (x109/L)
    Admission
    0.73
    Discharge
    0.49
    Reference interval
    1.19• 3.35
    Platelets (x109/L)
    Admission
    158
    Discharge
    228
    Reference interval
    158 – 424
    BUN (mmol/L)
    Admission
    5.8
    Discharge
    7.1
    Reference interval
    2.8• 8.3
    Creatinine (µmol/L)
    Admission
    58
    Discharge
    56
    Reference interval
    49 – 90
    ALT (U/L)
    Admission
    99
    Discharge
    88
    Reference interval
    10 – 36
    GGT (U/L)
    Admission
    145
    Discharge
    151
    Reference interval
    9 – 35
    CRP (mg/)
    Admission
    2.6
    Discharge
    <1
    Reference interval
    < 5
    Troponin I (ng/L)
    Admission
    3508.3
    Discharge
    58
    Reference interval
    0 – 15.6
    NT-proBNP (ng/L)
    Admission
    30662
    Discharge
    2714
    Reference interval
    <125.0

    BUN = blood urea nitrogen; ALT = alanine transaminase; GGT = gamma-glutamyl transferase; CRP = c-reactive protein; NT-proBNP = N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide.

    Conclusion: Although FM has historically high mortality rates, MCS can be associated with promising results. We described a case of SARS-CoV-2-related FM with full recovery managed solely with Impella CP support, which provides significantly less support than the more commonly used venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenationor (VA ECMO) or Impella 5.5.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Tschöpe C, Van Linthout S, Klein O, Mairinger T, Krackhardt F, Potapov EV, et al. Mechanical Unloading by Fulminant Myocarditis: LV-IMPELLA, ECMELLA, BI-PELLA, and PROPELLA Concepts. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 April;12(2):116–23.DOI