Psychological functioning and life satisfaction of cardiac patients in rehabilitation

    Authors

    Keywords

    cardiac rehabilitation, self-efficacy, emotional distress, life satisfaction, education

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2025.289

    Full Text

    **Introduction:** Psychological functioning is an important factor in the recovery of cardiac patients. Previous findings indicate that stress, anxiety, and depression can negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes (1), while perceived self-efficacy (2) and life satisfaction (3) support better adaptation. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between emotional distress, self-efficacy, demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. **Patients and Methods:** The study included 118 participants (M = 63.39, SD = 10.16). Of these, 68% were men, 30% women, and 2% did not identify their gender. Standardized questionnaires were applied to assess depression, anxiety, stress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction. Data were analysed with correlation and regression analyses, as well as non-parametric tests for group differences. **Results:** Older age was positive predictor of stress (b = 0.013, p < .01), depression (b = 0.01, p < .05), and anxiety (b = 0.011, p < .01). Women reported significantly higher emotional distress compared to men (U = 46, p < .05). Self-efficacy correlated negatively with anxiety (r = –.24, p < .01) and stress (r = –.23, p < .05). Life satisfaction was positively related to self-efficacy (r = .35, p < .001) and negatively with depression (r = –.26, p < .01), anxiety (r = –.23, p < .05), and stress (r = –.29, p < .01). Patients with higher education levels reported greater self-efficacy and better evaluations of life conditions and achievements than those with lower education. **Conclusion:** Results emphasize the role of psychological factors and education in cardiac rehabilitation. Interventions aimed at reducing emotional distress and enhancing self-efficacy could improve life satisfaction and support better rehabilitation outcomes.

    Literature

    1. Rao A, Zecchin R, Newton PJ, Phillips JL, DiGiacomo M, Denniss AR, et al. The prevalence and impact of depression and anxiety in cardiac rehabilitation: A longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 March;27(5):478–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319871716
    2. Woodgate J, Brawley LR. Self-efficacy for exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: review and recommendations. J Health Psychol. 2008 April;13(3):366–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105307088141
    3. Stauber S, Schmid JP, Saner H, Znoj H, Saner G, Grolimund J, et al. Health-related quality of life is associated with positive affect in patients with coronary heart disease entering cardiac rehabilitation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 March;20(1):79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9311-6
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Psychological functioning and life satisfaction of cardiac patients in rehabilitation

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages289
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2025.289
    cardiac rehabilitation
    self-efficacy
    emotional distress
    life satisfaction
    education

    Authors

    Marica Komosar-Cvetković*ORCIDThalassotherapia Opatija, Opatija, Croatia
    Damjan DuševićORCIDThalassotherapia Opatija, Opatija, Croatia
    Irena Kužet MiokovićORCIDThalassotherapia Opatija, Opatija, Croatia
    Maja PištelekORCIDThalassotherapia Opatija, Opatija, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: komosar.marica@gmail.com

    Full Text

    Introduction: Psychological functioning is an important factor in the recovery of cardiac patients. Previous findings indicate that stress, anxiety, and depression can negatively affect rehabilitation outcomes (1), while perceived self-efficacy (2) and life satisfaction (3) support better adaptation. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between emotional distress, self-efficacy, demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.

    Patients and Methods: The study included 118 participants (M = 63.39, SD = 10.16). Of these, 68% were men, 30% women, and 2% did not identify their gender. Standardized questionnaires were applied to assess depression, anxiety, stress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction. Data were analysed with correlation and regression analyses, as well as non-parametric tests for group differences.

    Results: Older age was positive predictor of stress (b = 0.013, p < .01), depression (b = 0.01, p < .05), and anxiety (b = 0.011, p < .01). Women reported significantly higher emotional distress compared to men (U = 46, p < .05). Self-efficacy correlated negatively with anxiety (r = –.24, p < .01) and stress (r = –.23, p < .05). Life satisfaction was positively related to self-efficacy (r = .35, p < .001) and negatively with depression (r = –.26, p < .01), anxiety (r = –.23, p < .05), and stress (r = –.29, p < .01). Patients with higher education levels reported greater self-efficacy and better evaluations of life conditions and achievements than those with lower education.

    Conclusion: Results emphasize the role of psychological factors and education in cardiac rehabilitation. Interventions aimed at reducing emotional distress and enhancing self-efficacy could improve life satisfaction and support better rehabilitation outcomes.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Rao A, Zecchin R, Newton PJ, Phillips JL, DiGiacomo M, Denniss AR, et al. The prevalence and impact of depression and anxiety in cardiac rehabilitation: A longitudinal cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 March;27(5):478–89.DOI
    2. 2.
      Woodgate J, Brawley LR. Self-efficacy for exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: review and recommendations. J Health Psychol. 2008 April;13(3):366–87.DOI
    3. 3.
      Stauber S, Schmid JP, Saner H, Znoj H, Saner G, Grolimund J, et al. Health-related quality of life is associated with positive affect in patients with coronary heart disease entering cardiac rehabilitation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2013 March;20(1):79–87.DOI