Patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients after myocardial infarction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting

    Authors

    Keywords

    dual antiplatelet therapy, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.381

    Full Text

    **Introduction:** Current guidelines for management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) point out that in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for 12 months, regardless of the method of revascularization. (1) It is evident from routine clinical practice that there are variations in the prescription of DAPT and that the guidelines are not being sufficiently adhered to. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and variations in DAPT prescribing patterns among patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following an AMI. **Patients and Methods**: This was a registry-based study, conducted at Dubrava University Hospital. We recruited patients diagnosed with AMI who underwent CABG from December 2016 to January 2024. We collected data on gender, age, body-mas index (BMI), type of AMI: ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation (NSTE-ACS), prescribed medications after discharge (single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), DAPT with ASA plus clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel) and data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which were divided into three groups: non-MACE, adverse coronary events and others: stroke, pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation and bleeding. **Results**: We included total of 126 patients. The median follow-up was 21.8 months (IQR:32.1:2.7). Median age was 67 years (IQR:59-73), 76.2% were male and 87.3% had NSTE-ACS. Total of 73.8% patients received DAPT after CABG of which majority (88.8%) were discharged with clopidogrel plus ASA. Of the remaining patients, 28.6% received SAPT with ASA and 7.9% were discharged with DAPT including ASA and ticagrelor. No patient received prasugrel. A chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference (p<.001) in prescribing DAPT depending on STEMI vs. NSTE-ACS but no statistically significant differences were found comparing prescribed DAPT and MACEs (p<0.197). There was also no difference in DAPT prescribing patterns in relation to gender, age and BMI. **Conclusion**: The most common prescribed pattern remains DAPT with clopidogrel even though the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology give priority to the DAPT with ticagrelor.

    Literature

    1. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 October 12;44(38):3720–826. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Patterns of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients after myocardial infarction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages381
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.381
    dual antiplatelet therapy
    acute myocardial infarction
    coronary artery bypass grafting

    Authors

    Klara Pospiš*ORCIDSpecial Hospital for Medical Rehabilitation Krapinske Toplice, Krapinske Toplice, Croatia
    Fran ŠalerORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivan ZeljkovićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Marin PavlovORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Jasmina ĆatićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Šime ManolaORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivana JurinORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: klara.pospis@gmail.com

    Full Text

    Introduction: Current guidelines for management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) point out that in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended for 12 months, regardless of the method of revascularization. (1) It is evident from routine clinical practice that there are variations in the prescription of DAPT and that the guidelines are not being sufficiently adhered to. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and variations in DAPT prescribing patterns among patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following an AMI.

    Patients and Methods: This was a registry-based study, conducted at Dubrava University Hospital. We recruited patients diagnosed with AMI who underwent CABG from December 2016 to January 2024. We collected data on gender, age, body-mas index (BMI), type of AMI: ST-elevation (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation (NSTE-ACS), prescribed medications after discharge (single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), DAPT with ASA plus clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel) and data on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which were divided into three groups: non-MACE, adverse coronary events and others: stroke, pulmonary embolism, atrial fibrillation and bleeding.

    Results: We included total of 126 patients. The median follow-up was 21.8 months (IQR:32.1:2.7). Median age was 67 years (IQR:59-73), 76.2% were male and 87.3% had NSTE-ACS. Total of 73.8% patients received DAPT after CABG of which majority (88.8%) were discharged with clopidogrel plus ASA. Of the remaining patients, 28.6% received SAPT with ASA and 7.9% were discharged with DAPT including ASA and ticagrelor. No patient received prasugrel. A chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference (p<.001) in prescribing DAPT depending on STEMI vs. NSTE-ACS but no statistically significant differences were found comparing prescribed DAPT and MACEs (p<0.197). There was also no difference in DAPT prescribing patterns in relation to gender, age and BMI.

    Conclusion: The most common prescribed pattern remains DAPT with clopidogrel even though the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology give priority to the DAPT with ticagrelor.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 October 12;44(38):3720–826.DOI