Interventional cardiology in a complex patient – a case report

    Authors

    Keywords

    bifascicular block, complex percutaneous coronary intervention, peripheral artery disease, transcatheter aortic valve implantation

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.485

    Full Text

    **Introduction**: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the optimal solution for many patients but requires procedure planning and prediction of possible complications. Sometimes, a permanent pacemaker must be implanted during or after the procedure. Therefore, preoperative implantation is indicated in high-risk patients, especially if other indications are also present (1). **Case report**: 80-year-old patient came to the Emergency Department of University Hospital Centre Rijeka due to difficulty breathing and exercise intolerance. Acute heart failure was diagnosed with the bifascicular block and intermittent second-degree atrioventricular block Mobitz type I (**Figure 1**). Earlier documentation and a two-week discharge letter from another institution have shown numerous percutaneous interventions of all coronary arteries, as well as peripheral arterial disease and severe aortic stenosis with the low flow-low gradient phenomenon. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 37%. The last coronarography two weeks ago showed significant stenosis of the ostium of the left anterior descending artery (LAD - 70%) with tubular stenosis of the left main trunk (LM - 50%) and stenosis of the circumflex artery ostium (LCx - 50 - 60%). Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) suggested hemodynamically insignificant stenosis of LCx ostium (0.93). In the same act, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the middle LCx was performed due to subocclusive stenosis. The patient’s case should have been presented to the Heart team, but he was urgently hospitalized. A device for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P) was implanted, and subsequent hospitalization was arranged in six days for coronarography and TAVI procedures. At the beginning of the procedure, a calcified 90% stenosis was shown in the previously placed stent of the left external iliac artery, and dilation was performed (**Figure 2**). Then, significant stenoses of the ostium and proximal LCx and the distal LM and proximal LAD were observed. Successful PCI LM/LAD/LCx was performed (**Figure 3**), and afterward, the TAVI procedure was continued. The Evolut R prosthesis was implanted in the proper position and function (**Figure 4**). The patient was discharged in good general condition. At the follow-up ultrasound three months after the procedure, LVEF recovery was observed at 55%, and the patient felt much better. The next check-up was in half a year, the patient had no symptoms. FIGURE 1. Bifascicular block and intermittent second-degree atrioventricular block Mobitz type I. FIGURE 2. Calcified 90% stenosis in the previously placed stent of the left external iliac artery. FIGURE 3. Before and after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main trunk, the left anterior descending and the circumflex artery FIGURE 4. Proper position and function of the Evolut R prosthesis. **Conclusion:** Complex cardiac interventions require detailed preparation, especially in fragile elderly patients. In some patients, expedited interventional treatment is needed to prevent the irreversible progression of symptoms.

    Literature

    1. Patel KP, Lim WY, Pavithran A, Assadi R, Wan D, Kennon S, et al. Early pacemaker implantation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation is safe and effective. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 January;45(1):103–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14397
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Interventional cardiology in a complex patient – a case report

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages485-486
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.485
    bifascicular block
    complex percutaneous coronary intervention
    peripheral artery disease
    transcatheter aortic valve implantation

    Authors

    Matko Spicijarić*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
    David GobićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
    Sandro BrusichORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
    Vjekoslav TomulićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: matko.spicijaric@gmail.com

    Full Text

    Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the optimal solution for many patients but requires procedure planning and prediction of possible complications. Sometimes, a permanent pacemaker must be implanted during or after the procedure. Therefore, preoperative implantation is indicated in high-risk patients, especially if other indications are also present (1).

    Case report: 80-year-old patient came to the Emergency Department of University Hospital Centre Rijeka due to difficulty breathing and exercise intolerance. Acute heart failure was diagnosed with the bifascicular block and intermittent second-degree atrioventricular block Mobitz type I (Figure 1). Earlier documentation and a two-week discharge letter from another institution have shown numerous percutaneous interventions of all coronary arteries, as well as peripheral arterial disease and severe aortic stenosis with the low flow-low gradient phenomenon. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 37%. The last coronarography two weeks ago showed significant stenosis of the ostium of the left anterior descending artery (LAD - 70%) with tubular stenosis of the left main trunk (LM - 50%) and stenosis of the circumflex artery ostium (LCx - 50 - 60%). Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) suggested hemodynamically insignificant stenosis of LCx ostium (0.93). In the same act, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the middle LCx was performed due to subocclusive stenosis. The patient’s case should have been presented to the Heart team, but he was urgently hospitalized. A device for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-P) was implanted, and subsequent hospitalization was arranged in six days for coronarography and TAVI procedures. At the beginning of the procedure, a calcified 90% stenosis was shown in the previously placed stent of the left external iliac artery, and dilation was performed (Figure 2). Then, significant stenoses of the ostium and proximal LCx and the distal LM and proximal LAD were observed. Successful PCI LM/LAD/LCx was performed (Figure 3), and afterward, the TAVI procedure was continued. The Evolut R prosthesis was implanted in the proper position and function (Figure 4). The patient was discharged in good general condition. At the follow-up ultrasound three months after the procedure, LVEF recovery was observed at 55%, and the patient felt much better. The next check-up was in half a year, the patient had no symptoms.

    FIGURE 1. Bifascicular block and intermittent second-degree atrioventricular block Mobitz type I.

    FIGURE 2. Calcified 90% stenosis in the previously placed stent of the left external iliac artery.

    FIGURE 3. Before and after successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main trunk, the left anterior descending and the circumflex artery

    FIGURE 4. Proper position and function of the Evolut R prosthesis.

    Conclusion: Complex cardiac interventions require detailed preparation, especially in fragile elderly patients. In some patients, expedited interventional treatment is needed to prevent the irreversible progression of symptoms.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Patel KP, Lim WY, Pavithran A, Assadi R, Wan D, Kennon S, et al. Early pacemaker implantation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation is safe and effective. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 January;45(1):103–10.DOI