Authors
- Krešimir Librenjak — Zadar General Hospital, Zadar, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-4168-6120
- Karla Zubčić — Zadar General Hospital, Zadar, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-3512-9472
- Ana Martinović — Zadar General Hospital, Zadar, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-9077-6352
- Ante Anić — Zadar General Hospital, Zadar, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-6864-3999
Keywords
implantable cardioverter defibrillator, inappropriate shock, ventricular fibrillation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2016.561Full Text
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been for a long time the most important device in prevention of sudden cardiac death caused by malignant arrhythmias, be it in primary or secondary prevention. (1) The device uses extreme precision and programmed sensitivity of 0.3 mV to recognize fine amplitudes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and, following detection and arrhythmia confirmation, delivers programmed therapies. In a small number electromagnetic interference from an external source can conceal the cardiac signal and lead to inappropriate shock delivery. The electromagnetic interference that the device senses instead of a cardiac signal is usually caused by faulty electrical devices, various muscle stimulators, transcutaneous nerve stimulation, alternating current of 50 Hz in defective home installations which is the case in old housing objects, working with electrical appliances in the rain, cleaning of fish tanks while it’s systems are under voltage. Actually, working with any kind of faulty electrical appliance, especially in moist conditions, can lead to leakage of alternating electrical current and detection of that current by the ICD. During regular check-ups of implanted ICDs in our patients we have noticed a certain number of stored episodes when the cardiac electric signal was disguised with electromagnetic interference, ensuing in a detected and inaccurately interpreted arrhythmia. In one case ICD had, due to a longer lasting influence of alternating current of minimal power (voltage), detected VF and delivered an inappropriate shock. The event happened while the patient was taking a shower in a bathtub with inappropriately designed electrical installations in an old apartment building. The first recommendation to the patient was to take the shower with all the appliances turned off inside the bathroom, and the next step would be changing and repairing electrical installations by professional staff.
Literature
- Chan NY, Wai-Ling Ho L. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock due to external alternating current leak: report of two cases. Europace. 2005;7(2):193–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eupc.2004.09.010