Impact of reduced creatinine clearance on early heart transplantation outcomes: a propensity score adjusted analysis

    Authors

    Keywords

    heart transplantation, renal failure, outcomes

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar.2015.208

    Full Text

    Goal: Renal insufficiency is a relative contraindication for isolated heart transplantation (HTx). ( 1 - 3 ) We aimed to determine the independent effect of preoperative creatinine clearance (CrCl) on HTx outcomes. Patients and Methods: 220 patients underwent HTx in Croatia from 2008 to 2014. Four patients were excluded due to missing data. Patients were dichotomized according to a CrCl cut-off value of 50 ml/min (Group A: CrCl≤50 ml/min; Group B: CrCl>50 ml/min). Sixty-three patients (29%) had a CrCl≤50 ml/min. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was performed by accounting for recipient age and gender, AF, smoking, ischemic time, CPB time, BMI, mechanical circulatory assistance (MCS) and reoperation. Results: Patients in Group A were older (56±11 vs. 49±12 years, P<0.001) and had longer donor ischemic times (197±65 vs. 162±62 min, P<0.001). No significant differences were noted in recipient gender (48/63 (76%) vs. 125/153 (82%) male, P=0.355), donor age (39±13 vs. 39±12 years, P=0.875), donor gender (46/63 (73%) vs. 100/153 (65%) male, P=0.338), PVR (213±107 vs. 188±96 dyn*s*cm−5, P=0.145), diabetes (18/63 (29%) vs. 34/153 (22%), P=0.382), reoperation (18/63 (29%) vs. 34/153 (22%), P=0.382), CPB duration (175±62 vs. 158±56 min, P=0.06) or preoperative MCS (6/63 (10%) vs. 17/153 (11%), P=0.813). Six-month mortality was higher in patients with a CrCl≤50 ml/min (18/63 (29%) vs. 19/153 (12%); unadjusted OR 2.82 [95% CI 1.36-5.84]; P=0.009). Similarly, group A patients were more likely to require renal replacement therapy (RRT) (16/63 (25%) vs. 17/153 (11%); OR 2.72 (1.28-5.82); P=0.012). After PS adjustment these differences remained significant for both 6-month mortality and RRT (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.09-5.49]; P=0.030 and OR 3.36 [95% CI 1.43-7.92]; P=0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with a CrCl≤50 ml/min undergoing isolated HTx had inferior 6-month survival and required RRT more commonly. The impact of CrCl remained significant after adjustment for multiple perioperative covariates.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Impact of reduced creatinine clearance on early heart transplantation outcomes: a propensity score adjusted analysis

    Abstract
    Issue9-10
    Published
    Pages208
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar.2015.208
    heart transplantation
    renal failure
    outcomes

    Authors

    Hrvoje Gašparovic*ORCIDCroatia
    Daniel UnicORCIDCroatia
    Lucija SvetinaORCIDCroatia
    Jure SamardzicORCIDCroatia
    Maja CikešORCIDCroatia
    Zeljko BaricevicORCIDCroatia
    Boško SkoricORCIDCroatia
    Tomislav KopjarORCIDCroatia
    Darko AnicORCIDCroatia
    Višnja IvancanCroatia
    Zeljko SutlicCroatia
    Bojan BiocinaORCIDCroatia
    Davor MilicicORCIDCroatia

    Full Text

    Goal: Renal insufficiency is a relative contraindication for isolated heart transplantation (HTx). ( 1 - 3 ) We aimed to determine the independent effect of preoperative creatinine clearance (CrCl) on HTx outcomes. Patients and Methods: 220 patients underwent HTx in Croatia from 2008 to 2014. Four patients were excluded due to missing data. Patients were dichotomized according to a CrCl cut-off value of 50 ml/min (Group A: CrCl≤50 ml/min; Group B: CrCl>50 ml/min). Sixty-three patients (29%) had a CrCl≤50 ml/min. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was performed by accounting for recipient age and gender, AF, smoking, ischemic time, CPB time, BMI, mechanical circulatory assistance (MCS) and reoperation. Results: Patients in Group A were older (56±11 vs. 49±12 years, P<0.001) and had longer donor ischemic times (197±65 vs. 162±62 min, P<0.001). No significant differences were noted in recipient gender (48/63 (76%) vs. 125/153 (82%) male, P=0.355), donor age (39±13 vs. 39±12 years, P=0.875), donor gender (46/63 (73%) vs. 100/153 (65%) male, P=0.338), PVR (213±107 vs. 188±96 dyn*s*cm−5, P=0.145), diabetes (18/63 (29%) vs. 34/153 (22%), P=0.382), reoperation (18/63 (29%) vs. 34/153 (22%), P=0.382), CPB duration (175±62 vs. 158±56 min, P=0.06) or preoperative MCS (6/63 (10%) vs. 17/153 (11%), P=0.813). Six-month mortality was higher in patients with a CrCl≤50 ml/min (18/63 (29%) vs. 19/153 (12%); unadjusted OR 2.82 [95% CI 1.36-5.84]; P=0.009). Similarly, group A patients were more likely to require renal replacement therapy (RRT) (16/63 (25%) vs. 17/153 (11%); OR 2.72 (1.28-5.82); P=0.012). After PS adjustment these differences remained significant for both 6-month mortality and RRT (OR 2.44 [95% CI 1.09-5.49]; P=0.030 and OR 3.36 [95% CI 1.43-7.92]; P=0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with a CrCl≤50 ml/min undergoing isolated HTx had inferior 6-month survival and required RRT more commonly. The impact of CrCl remained significant after adjustment for multiple perioperative covariates.