Electrophysiological characteristics of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac transplantation – a case series

    Authors

    Keywords

    supraventricular tachycardia, supraventricular arrhythmia, radiofrequency ablation, cardiac transplantation

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2021.13

    Full Text

    Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) are increasingly recognized late complications after cardiac transplantation (CTX). The most commonly described arrhythmias include cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL), other macroreentrant atrial tachycardias (MRAT) and focal atrial tachycardias (AT). Although surgical substrate can be important, the effect of the surgical technique on the mechanism and the occurrence of arrhythmia remains unclear. ( 1 - 3 ) We describe characteristics of CTX patients who presented with SVT for electrophysiological studies (EPS) at our centre from 2017 to 2020. Among 6 patients (mean age 48 ± 18 years, 4 of 6 were men), 2 presented during the first year after CTX, while 4 patients presented after a long follow-up (13.3 ± 2.8 years). Cardiac rejection was ruled out in all patients. In 3 patients significant graft vasculopathy was present. Initially, the conventional EPS was performed in all patients. In 5 cases, the initial diagnosis was CTI-dependent AFL and a successful radiofrequency ablation of CTI was performed. In one case, the arrhythmia was due to the non-CTI-dependent MRAT and rate-control strategy was adopted. During the follow-up (29.2 ± 10.2 months), 3 patients remained without recurrences. In two patients early recurrence was noted (after 1 and 3 months) and a second EPS was performed (conventional or electroanatomical mapping) which demonstrated the multiple MRAT unsuitable for ablation. These patients were managed conservatively while one of them received second CTX due to advanced graft vasculopathy. During the follow-up one patient died due to graft rejection. In our group of patients typical AFL and other non-CTI-dependent MRAT were observed. In CTI-dependent AFL, conventional radiofrequency ablation was effective, while recurrences were more difficult to treat. Extensive scarring of the atria is the substrate for multiple MRAT circles that are not easily amenable with ablation.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Electrophysiological characteristics of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac transplantation – a case series

    Extended Abstract
    Issue1-2
    Published
    Pages13
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2021.13
    supraventricular tachycardia
    supraventricular arrhythmia
    radiofrequency ablation
    cardiac transplantation

    Authors

    Ivan Prepolec*ORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Vedran PašaraORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Borka Pezo-NikolićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Maja ČikešORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Boško SkorićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Davor PuljevićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Davor MiličićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
    Vedran VelagićORCIDUniversity of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

    Full Text

    Supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) are increasingly recognized late complications after cardiac transplantation (CTX). The most commonly described arrhythmias include cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL), other macroreentrant atrial tachycardias (MRAT) and focal atrial tachycardias (AT). Although surgical substrate can be important, the effect of the surgical technique on the mechanism and the occurrence of arrhythmia remains unclear. ( 1 - 3 ) We describe characteristics of CTX patients who presented with SVT for electrophysiological studies (EPS) at our centre from 2017 to 2020. Among 6 patients (mean age 48 ± 18 years, 4 of 6 were men), 2 presented during the first year after CTX, while 4 patients presented after a long follow-up (13.3 ± 2.8 years). Cardiac rejection was ruled out in all patients. In 3 patients significant graft vasculopathy was present. Initially, the conventional EPS was performed in all patients. In 5 cases, the initial diagnosis was CTI-dependent AFL and a successful radiofrequency ablation of CTI was performed. In one case, the arrhythmia was due to the non-CTI-dependent MRAT and rate-control strategy was adopted. During the follow-up (29.2 ± 10.2 months), 3 patients remained without recurrences. In two patients early recurrence was noted (after 1 and 3 months) and a second EPS was performed (conventional or electroanatomical mapping) which demonstrated the multiple MRAT unsuitable for ablation. These patients were managed conservatively while one of them received second CTX due to advanced graft vasculopathy. During the follow-up one patient died due to graft rejection. In our group of patients typical AFL and other non-CTI-dependent MRAT were observed. In CTI-dependent AFL, conventional radiofrequency ablation was effective, while recurrences were more difficult to treat. Extensive scarring of the atria is the substrate for multiple MRAT circles that are not easily amenable with ablation.