Authors
- Jure Samardžić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-9346-6402
- Vedran Velagić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-5425-5840
- Boško Skorić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-5979-2346
- Saša Pavasović — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-3705-0226
- Marijan Pašalić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-3197-2190
- Hrvoje Jurin — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-2599-553X
- Ivo Planinc — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-0561-6704
- Maja Čikeš — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-4772-5549
- Davor Puljević — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-3603-2242
- Davor Miličić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-9101-1570
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, platelet reactivity
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.375Full Text
Introduction : Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures increase the potential thromboembolic risk ( 1 ). The aim of this study was to compare the effect of radiofrequency (RF) ablation and cryoablation on platelet reactivity (PR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients and Methods : We analyzed PR levels using Multiplate function analyzer in 63 consecutive patients undergoing PVI procedures in our institution. Blood samples were drawn just before the procedure and on the following day. Fourty six (46) and seventeen (17) patients underwent cryoablation and RF ablation, respectively. There was no difference in demographics and baseline platelet parameters (platelet count, MPV and PR) between patients in RF and cryo group. ASPI, ADP and TRAPtest were used to --assess multiple pathways of platelet activation. Results : One day after the procedure mean PR droped from baseline levels in both study groups. The observed delta was more expressed in the cryo group for all three PR tests but only ADPtest showed statistically significant difference in PR ( Figure 1 ). Platelet reactivity before and after pulmonary vein isolation. RF = radiofrequency Conclusion : Our results show that PR after cryoablation is less pronounced compared to RF procedure. This affirms that thrombogenic burden of PVI is lower with cryoablation. We hypothesize that this could be a result of endocardial integrity preservation and decreased availability of platelet agonists during cryoablation. These results warrant further investigations with periinterventional PR measurements on a larger cohort of patients.