Comparison of regional 2D strain analysis to visual wall motion abnormality assessment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

    Authors

    Keywords

    regional wall motion assessment, acute coronary syndrome, coronary stenosis localization, regional 2D strain

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.119

    Full Text

    **Background:** Visual assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) on echocardiography represents the current standard in assessing the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) induced changes in myocardial contractility. Although it has been proven to predict long-term outcomes it has been hard to rely on in acute situations due to the patient dependent variance in image acquisition quality and interoperator variability. (1-4) We hypothesized that regional 2DS assessment due to the evaluation of longitudinal shortening that is barely visible to the naked eye could potentially be more sensitive than visual RWMA assessment in detecting ischemia induced loss of contractility in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). **Methods:** We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted through our Emergency Room to the Cardiology Department from January 2013 till December 2015 with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography, patients with known prior coronary artery disease and patients who did not receive an echo in the 24 hours prior to angiography were excluded, as were the patients with images not adequate for 2D strain analysis. A total of 123 patients fulfilled the criteria and were included in the analysis and 4 different clinicians blinded to laboratory and ECG results performed 2DS analysis of global and regional 2D longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) according to the 18-segment model prior to coronary angiography. Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) as interpreted by the clinician performing the original echo exam were categorized according to the wall motion score guidelines. **Results:** RWMA assessment shows good predictive power of coronary artery stenosis location in LAD and LCx, but not in RCA (**Table 1**). However, LPSS was significantly more precise overall (mean sensitivity 75.6% vs 39.5%, P<0.001). Statistically significant difference was present even after accounting for potentially confounding factors like arterial hypertension, smoking, alcohol, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, age or prior medical therapy. ### Table 1: Regional visual wall motion assessment 2D longitudinal peak systolic strain values according to segments and location of coronary stenosis. | Segment | Lession location | *P* | | --- | --- | --- | | APLAX Basal anteroseptum | LAD | 0.098 | | APLAX Mid anteroseptum | LAD | <0.0001 | | APLAX Apical anteroseptum | LAD | <0.0001 | | APLAX Apical inferolateral | LCx | <0.0001 | | APLAX Mid inferolateral | LCx | 0.04 | | APLAX Basal inferolateral | LCx | 0.01 | | A4C Basal inferoseptal | RCA | 0.087 | | A4C Mid inferoseptal | LAD | 0.1 | | A4C Apical inferoseptal | LAD | <0.0001 | | A4C Apical anterolateral | LAD | 0.003 | | A4C Mid anterolateral | LCx | 0.366 | | A4C Basal anterolateral | LCx | 0.015 | | A2C Basal inferior | RCA | 0.133 | | A2C Mid inferior | RCA | 0.722 | | A2C Apical inferior | LAD | 0.15 | | A2C Apical anterior | LAD | <0.0001 | | A2C Mid anterior | LAD | 0.027 | | A2C Basal anterior | LAD | 0.032 | [†] LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCx = left circumflex coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery; APLAX = Apical long axis view; A4C = Apical four chamber view; A2C = Apical two chamber view. **Conclusion:** We have shown that a decrease in LPSS is significantly more accurate in detecting ischemia-induced loss of myocardial contractility than the visual assessment of RWMA in patients with NSTE-ACS. Our findings imply that 2DS should be employed as a supplementary tool during the echo assessment of patients with NSTE-ACS.

    Literature

    1. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539–42. https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0402.102975
    2. Sabia P, Afrookteh A, Touchstone DA, Keller MW, Esquivel L, Kaul S. Value of regional wall motion abnormality in the emergency room diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1991 Sep;84(3) Suppl:I85–92. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1884510/
    3. Montgomery DE, Puthumana JJ, Fox JM, Ogunyankin KO. Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):579–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer282
    4. Choi JO, Cho SW, Song YB, Cho SJ, Song BG, Lee SC, et al. Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;10(5):695–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jep041
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Comparison of regional 2D strain analysis to visual wall motion abnormality assessment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

    Extended Abstract
    Issue4
    Published
    Pages119-120
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.119
    regional wall motion assessment
    acute coronary syndrome
    coronary stenosis localization
    regional 2D strain

    Authors

    Daniel Lovrić*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Kristina GašparovićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Vlatka Rešković LukšićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Marijan PašalićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Dejan DošenORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Jana Ljubas MačekORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Zvonimir OstojićORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Marija BrestovacORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Jadranka Šeparović HanževačkiORCIDUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: daniel@dlovric.net

    Full Text

    Background: Visual assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) on echocardiography represents the current standard in assessing the impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) induced changes in myocardial contractility. Although it has been proven to predict long-term outcomes it has been hard to rely on in acute situations due to the patient dependent variance in image acquisition quality and interoperator variability. (1–4) We hypothesized that regional 2DS assessment due to the evaluation of longitudinal shortening that is barely visible to the naked eye could potentially be more sensitive than visual RWMA assessment in detecting ischemia induced loss of contractility in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

    Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted through our Emergency Room to the Cardiology Department from January 2013 till December 2015 with the diagnosis of NSTE-ACS. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography, patients with known prior coronary artery disease and patients who did not receive an echo in the 24 hours prior to angiography were excluded, as were the patients with images not adequate for 2D strain analysis. A total of 123 patients fulfilled the criteria and were included in the analysis and 4 different clinicians blinded to laboratory and ECG results performed 2DS analysis of global and regional 2D longitudinal peak systolic strain (LPSS) according to the 18-segment model prior to coronary angiography. Regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) as interpreted by the clinician performing the original echo exam were categorized according to the wall motion score guidelines.

    Results: RWMA assessment shows good predictive power of coronary artery stenosis location in LAD and LCx, but not in RCA (Table 1). However, LPSS was significantly more precise overall (mean sensitivity 75.6% vs 39.5%, P<0.001). Statistically significant difference was present even after accounting for potentially confounding factors like arterial hypertension, smoking, alcohol, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, age or prior medical therapy.

    Table 1: Regional visual wall motion assessment 2D longitudinal peak systolic strain values according to segments and location of coronary stenosis.

    APLAX Basal anteroseptum
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.098
    APLAX Mid anteroseptum
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    <0.0001
    APLAX Apical anteroseptum
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    <0.0001
    APLAX Apical inferolateral
    Lession location
    LCx
    P
    <0.0001
    APLAX Mid inferolateral
    Lession location
    LCx
    P
    0.04
    APLAX Basal inferolateral
    Lession location
    LCx
    P
    0.01
    A4C Basal inferoseptal
    Lession location
    RCA
    P
    0.087
    A4C Mid inferoseptal
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.1
    A4C Apical inferoseptal
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    <0.0001
    A4C Apical anterolateral
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.003
    A4C Mid anterolateral
    Lession location
    LCx
    P
    0.366
    A4C Basal anterolateral
    Lession location
    LCx
    P
    0.015
    A2C Basal inferior
    Lession location
    RCA
    P
    0.133
    A2C Mid inferior
    Lession location
    RCA
    P
    0.722
    A2C Apical inferior
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.15
    A2C Apical anterior
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    <0.0001
    A2C Mid anterior
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.027
    A2C Basal anterior
    Lession location
    LAD
    P
    0.032

    LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; LCx = left circumflex coronary artery; RCA = right coronary artery; APLAX = Apical long axis view; A4C = Apical four chamber view; A2C = Apical two chamber view.

    Conclusion: We have shown that a decrease in LPSS is significantly more accurate in detecting ischemia-induced loss of myocardial contractility than the visual assessment of RWMA in patients with NSTE-ACS. Our findings imply that 2DS should be employed as a supplementary tool during the echo assessment of patients with NSTE-ACS.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539–42.DOI
    2. 2.
      Sabia P, Afrookteh A, Touchstone DA, Keller MW, Esquivel L, Kaul S. Value of regional wall motion abnormality in the emergency room diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1991 Sep;84(3) Suppl:I85–92.PubMed
    3. 3.
      Montgomery DE, Puthumana JJ, Fox JM, Ogunyankin KO. Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):579–87.DOI
    4. 4.
      Choi JO, Cho SW, Song YB, Cho SJ, Song BG, Lee SC, et al. Longitudinal 2D strain at rest predicts the presence of left main and three vessel coronary artery disease in patients without regional wall motion abnormality. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;10(5):695–701.DOI