Careful preoperative planning of aortic valve surgery – impact of echocardiography and CT parameters

    Authors

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2019.228

    Full Text

    Objective : We can observe an increase in incidence and prevalence of patients with aortic valve stenosis in the general population. The gold standard in aortic valve therapy is aortic valve replacement. Preoperative planning is essential for good outcomes, as the severity of stenosis and calcifications can sometimes be extremely progressive and even involve the aortic root and ascending aorta. There is not enough research on comparation of CT scan analysis of aortic valve stenosis and echocardiography which is the golden standard of disease diagnosis. ( 1 - 3 ) Patients and Methods : We have analyzed 88 patients [age: 70.01±9.066 (mean±SD); female: n=45, 51.1%]. Among the patients, 12 had bicuspid aortic valve leaflet structure while the rest of the patients (n=76, 86.4%) exhibited TAV stenosis. Degree of aortic stenosis was assessed according to mean pressure gradient (MPG), peak pressure gradient (PPG), aortic valve area (AVA) indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) and maximum speed through aortic valve (Vmax). These were compared with calcium score (AVCS) calculated from CT scan. All of these patients were observed in the operating room during surgery and valves analyzed after explantation. All of the patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Results : Average AVCS values (median + IQ range) were 3306.3 (1995.4 – 4820.6) [female: 2215 (1463.35 – 3372.85); male: 4093.5 (3133.3 – 5274.4). Average AVCS values for BAV patients were 3063.5 (3323.125 – 4868.9) and 3106.55 (1965.375) – 4780.125) for TAV patients. There were significant correlations between AVCS and AVAi (Spearman’s ρ=−0.24, P=0.025), PPG (ρ= 0.38, P< 0.001), MPG (ρ= 0.36, P= 0.001) V max (ρ= 0.37, P < 0.001) and gender (ρ= 0.485, P < 0.001) while AVA values showed no significant correlation with AVCS (ρ= -0.066, P = 0.540). Overall survival was similar not depending of severity of calcifications and stenosis, however clamp time and surgery time were longer for patients with severely calcified valves which means calcium scoring as a parameter should also be taken in consideration during preoperative planning. Conclusion : Careful preoperative planning is essential for good outcome of surgery, here we have proven the connection between echocardiography parameters of aortic stenosis and calcium score calculated by CT scan.

    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Careful preoperative planning of aortic valve surgery – impact of echocardiography and CT parameters

    Extended Abstract
    Issue9-10
    Published
    Pages228
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2019.228

    Authors

    Josip Varvodić*ORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Dubravka ŠušnjarORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivana JurinORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Jasenka GrgurićORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Boris StarčevićORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Frane PaićORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
    Igor RudežORCIDUniversity Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia

    Full Text

    Objective : We can observe an increase in incidence and prevalence of patients with aortic valve stenosis in the general population. The gold standard in aortic valve therapy is aortic valve replacement. Preoperative planning is essential for good outcomes, as the severity of stenosis and calcifications can sometimes be extremely progressive and even involve the aortic root and ascending aorta. There is not enough research on comparation of CT scan analysis of aortic valve stenosis and echocardiography which is the golden standard of disease diagnosis. ( 1 - 3 ) Patients and Methods : We have analyzed 88 patients [age: 70.01±9.066 (mean±SD); female: n=45, 51.1%]. Among the patients, 12 had bicuspid aortic valve leaflet structure while the rest of the patients (n=76, 86.4%) exhibited TAV stenosis. Degree of aortic stenosis was assessed according to mean pressure gradient (MPG), peak pressure gradient (PPG), aortic valve area (AVA) indexed aortic valve area (AVAi) and maximum speed through aortic valve (Vmax). These were compared with calcium score (AVCS) calculated from CT scan. All of these patients were observed in the operating room during surgery and valves analyzed after explantation. All of the patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Results : Average AVCS values (median + IQ range) were 3306.3 (1995.4 – 4820.6) [female: 2215 (1463.35 – 3372.85); male: 4093.5 (3133.3 – 5274.4). Average AVCS values for BAV patients were 3063.5 (3323.125 – 4868.9) and 3106.55 (1965.375) – 4780.125) for TAV patients. There were significant correlations between AVCS and AVAi (Spearman’s ρ=−0.24, P=0.025), PPG (ρ= 0.38, P< 0.001), MPG (ρ= 0.36, P= 0.001) V max (ρ= 0.37, P < 0.001) and gender (ρ= 0.485, P < 0.001) while AVA values showed no significant correlation with AVCS (ρ= -0.066, P = 0.540). Overall survival was similar not depending of severity of calcifications and stenosis, however clamp time and surgery time were longer for patients with severely calcified valves which means calcium scoring as a parameter should also be taken in consideration during preoperative planning. Conclusion : Careful preoperative planning is essential for good outcome of surgery, here we have proven the connection between echocardiography parameters of aortic stenosis and calcium score calculated by CT scan.