Authors
- Gloria Lekšić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-4649-7764
- Jasmina Hranjec — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-8356-7376
- Marijan Pašalić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-3197-2190
- Boško Skorić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-5979-2346
- Jure Samardžić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-9346-6402
- Jana Ljubas — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Maček — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-7171-2206
- Daniel Lovrić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-5052-6559
- Hrvoje Jurin — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-2599-553X
- Ivo Planinc — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-0561-6704
- Dora Fabijanović — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Nina Jakuš — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-7304-1127
- Davor Miličić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-9101-1570
- Maja Čikeš — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-4772-5549
Keywords
cardiomyopathy, heart failure, NT-proBNP, mortality
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.355Full Text
Introduction : Accounting for the largest number of hospitalizations, heart failure (HF) currently creates a large burden on the health systems in Europe. Myocardial diseases, one of the most frequent causes of HF, are predominantly represented by ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), while hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often recognized as the second most frequent form of cardiomyopathy. ( 1 ) The aim of this study was to describe the etiological characteristics and survival within our HF cohort. Patients and Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 200 patients (71% male, mean age 47.8±11.7 years) with mild to moderate chronic HF (NYHA II and IIIa) treated at our Department between December 2010 and December 2014. The mean follow-up period was 44.9±16.5 months and overall survival was defined as the primary outcome of the study. Results : The most frequent etiologies of HF included dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (25%), ICM (26.5%) and secondary cardiomyopathy (hypertensive, valvular, toxic) (19.5%), while HCM accounted for only 8% of the cohort ( Figure 1 ). The overall survival in our cohort was 92%. No significant difference in the demographic parameters was noted among the surviving and deceased patients, except higher age and prevalence of diabetes in the deceased group. The majority of deceased patients were of DCM (8/15 deceased) and ICM (6/15) etiology. A trend towards higher overall mortality was noted in the DCM group compared to ICM, yet not reaching statistical significance (p=0.116) ( Figure 2 ), while multivariate analysis revealed this to be due to significantly lower EF in the DCM group. There was no significant difference in the demographic parameters, except age, among the surviving and deceased patients. By log rank test and ROC analysis, NT-proBNP provided the strongest prediction of mortality in the entire HF cohort (area under the curve 0.702, p<0.05) ( Figure 3 ). Distribution of cardiomyopathy etiologies. DCM = dilated cardiomyopathy, ICM = ischemic cardiomyopathy, Secondary CM = secondary cardiomyopathy, HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RCM = restrictive cardiomyopathy, ARC = arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, Myocarditis = cardiomyopathy after myocarditis, LVNC = left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the subgroups of patients with dilated and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to NTproBNP levels. Conclusion : Interestingly, the prevalence of DCM in our cohort is much higher than that described in European registries. NT-proBNP was confirmed to be a very reliable predictor of mortality in a diverse HF cohort. Our study suggests higher mortality in DCM patients (despite a younger age) compared to ICM, but a larger patient cohort and longer follow-up time is needed to confirm this trend.