Can estimated plasma volume status predict outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention? A single-centre registry-based study

    Authors

    Keywords

    estimated plasma volume status, transcatheter aortic valve implantation, heart failure, mortality

    DOI

    https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.469

    Full Text

    **Introduction**: Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) has been accepted as an alternative strategy for treating severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) (1). Congestion can worsen outcomes after TAVI and covert congestion can be indirectly assessed by estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) (2). Aim: to assess is high ePVS associated with higher all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in short-term (30 days) and long-term (12 months) follow up. **Patients and Methods**: We included patients treated in Dubrava University Hospital from December 2010 to September 2023, who underwent TAVI due to severe AS. We used Strauss-derived Duarte formula (EPVs= (100-hematocrit (%)) ÷ hemoglobin (g/L)) to estimate PVS values at the baseline (iePVS) and two days after TAVI procedure (pePVS). MACE included stroke, bleeding, worsening heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). **Results**: This study included 366 patients, median age 80 years, 48% female. Median iePVS was 5.598 (IQR 5.173-6.251) and median pePVS was 6.654 (IQR 6.227-7.375). Values of ePVS higher than median were considered as high. Patients with high iePVS had no significant difference in all-cause mortality or MACE during the short or long term follow up compared to those with low iePVS (p=0.960 for short-term and p=0.357 for long-term all-cause mortality, p=0.414 for short-term and p=0.414 for long-term MACE). However, patients with high pePVS had statistically significant higher all-cause mortality rate compared to patients with low pePVS (p=0.030) in long term follow up. Short term survival was similar in both groups (p=0.373). There was no significant difference in MACE in short (p=0.981) or long-term (p=0.296) follow up between the groups. **Conclusion:** Our results suggest that initial ePVS did not prove to be prognostic for the adverse short- or long-term outcomes of TAVI patients. Postprocedural ePVS predicted higher all-cause mortality in long-term follow up.

    Literature

    1. Krittanawong C, Virk HUH, Hahn J, Wang Z, Al-Azzam F, Alam M, et al. Clinical Outcome of TAVI vs. SAVR in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Clin Med. 2023 August 11;12(16):5236. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165236
    2. Maznyczka AM, Barakat M, Aldalati O, Eskandari M, Wollaston A, Tzalamouras V, et al. Calculated plasma volume status predicts outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Open Heart. 2020 December;7(2):e001477. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001477
    Cardiologia Croatica
    Back to search

    Can estimated plasma volume status predict outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve intervention? A single-centre registry-based study

    Extended Abstract
    Issue11-12
    Published
    Pages469
    PDF via DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2024.469
    estimated plasma volume status
    transcatheter aortic valve implantation
    heart failure
    mortality

    Authors

    Sara Varga*ORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivana JurinORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Fran ŠalerORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Vanja Ivanović MihajlovićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ana JordanORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Anđela JurišićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Hrvoje FalakORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Petra VitlovORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Danijela GrizeljORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Nikša BušićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Šime ManolaORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
    Ivan ZeljkovićORCIDDubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia

    *Correspondence email: sara.varga95@yahoo.com

    Full Text

    Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) has been accepted as an alternative strategy for treating severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) (1). Congestion can worsen outcomes after TAVI and covert congestion can be indirectly assessed by estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) (2). Aim: to assess is high ePVS associated with higher all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in short-term (30 days) and long-term (12 months) follow up.

    Patients and Methods: We included patients treated in Dubrava University Hospital from December 2010 to September 2023, who underwent TAVI due to severe AS. We used Strauss-derived Duarte formula (EPVs= (100-hematocrit (%)) ÷ hemoglobin (g/L)) to estimate PVS values at the baseline (iePVS) and two days after TAVI procedure (pePVS). MACE included stroke, bleeding, worsening heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

    Results: This study included 366 patients, median age 80 years, 48% female. Median iePVS was 5.598 (IQR 5.173-6.251) and median pePVS was 6.654 (IQR 6.227-7.375). Values of ePVS higher than median were considered as high. Patients with high iePVS had no significant difference in all-cause mortality or MACE during the short or long term follow up compared to those with low iePVS (p=0.960 for short-term and p=0.357 for long-term all-cause mortality, p=0.414 for short-term and p=0.414 for long-term MACE). However, patients with high pePVS had statistically significant higher all-cause mortality rate compared to patients with low pePVS (p=0.030) in long term follow up. Short term survival was similar in both groups (p=0.373). There was no significant difference in MACE in short (p=0.981) or long-term (p=0.296) follow up between the groups.

    Conclusion: Our results suggest that initial ePVS did not prove to be prognostic for the adverse short- or long-term outcomes of TAVI patients. Postprocedural ePVS predicted higher all-cause mortality in long-term follow up.

    Literature

    1. 1.
      Krittanawong C, Virk HUH, Hahn J, Wang Z, Al-Azzam F, Alam M, et al. Clinical Outcome of TAVI vs. SAVR in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Clin Med. 2023 August 11;12(16):5236.DOI
    2. 2.
      Maznyczka AM, Barakat M, Aldalati O, Eskandari M, Wollaston A, Tzalamouras V, et al. Calculated plasma volume status predicts outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Open Heart. 2020 December;7(2):e001477.DOI