Authors
- Filip Lončarić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-7865-1108
- Dora Fabijanović — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-2633-3439
- Vedran Velagić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-5425-5840
- Nina Jakuš — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-9346-6402
- Marijan Pašalić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-3197-2190
- Ivo Planinc — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-0561-6704
- Davor Miličić — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-9101-1570
- Maja Čikeš — University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-4772-5549
Abstract
**Background**: An advanced interatrial block (aIAB) is seen on the ECG as the combination of a P wave duration >120 ms and biphasic P wave morphology in the inferior leads. It is considered a marker of an electromechanically dysfunctional left atrium (LA) and hence a risk factor for supraventricular arrhythmias and heart failure (HF). (1) The aim of our pilot study is to explore aIAB as a potential marker for determining a clinically relevant subgroup of HF patients. **Patients and Methods**: An echocardiogram and a surface ECG were performed on a total of 51 HF patients in sinus rhythm (31 (61%) with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 20 (39%) with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)) diagnosed per the current guidelines, and 20 sex-matched healthy controls. Echocardiographic parameters of LA structure and function were measured. ECG measurements were performed digitally with an electronic calliper. **Results**: Prevalence of aIAB was 11% (n=8) in the studied group, significantly greater in HFpEF patients, compared to HFrEF patients and healthy controls (88% vs. 0% vs. 12%, p=0.025, **Figure 1**). The HFpEF patients formed an aIAB HFpEF subgroup (n=7) that was compared to two control groups, both without P wave duration >120 ms or biphasic P wave morphology in the inferior leads: age- and sex- matched HFpEF patients (n=7) and sex-matched healthy controls (n=12). Based on this subanalysis, the aIAB patients had a significantly higher occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (healthy controls vs. HFpEF controls vs. aIAB: 0% vs. 43% vs. 86%, p 120 ms | Biphasic P wave in inferior leads and P wave > 120 ms | Biphasic P wave in inferior leads and P wave > 120 ms | P values | P values | P values | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | Yes | No | | aIAB | aIAB | HFpEF controls | | | aIAB | HFpEF controls | Healthy controls | vs | vs | vs | | | (n=7) | (n=7) | (n=12) | HFpEF controls | Healthy controls | Healthy controls | | **Male sex – no. (%)** | 1 (14) | 1 (14) | 4 (33) | 1 | 0.603 | 0.603 | | **Age (IQR) –years** | 74 (71-81) | 75 (67-82) | 54 (51-55) | 1 | 2** | 46.4 (41.4-50.6) | 37.6 (32.7-54.1) | 26.6 (18.7-29.6) | 0.318 | 2** | 26.8 (23.9-32.0) | 21.6 (21.0-25.5) | 18.2 (15.0-20.3) | 0.073 | <0.0001 | 0.007 | | **LAEF (IQR) - %** | 34.6 (31.8-44.6) | 39.7 (31.0-41.3) | 57.8 (46.4-66.7) | 0.902 | 0.013 | 0.005 | | **V max (IQR) - ml** | 85.0 (81.0-109.0) | 71.0 (61.0-92.0) | 51.5 (35.5-59.5) | 0.259 | <0.0001 | 0.005 | | **V min (IQR) - ml** | 53.0 (35.0-75.0) | 42.0 (38.0-51.0) | 20.5 (12.3-28.8) | 0.456 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | | **preA volume (IQR) - ml** | 64.0 (52.0-86.0) | 59.0 (46.0-65.0) | 38.0 (22.2-28.8) | 0.456 | <0.0001 | 0.010 | [†] aIAB – advanced interatrial block; HFpEF – heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; IQR – interquartile range, AF – atrial fibrillation; LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction; LAVI – left atrial volume index; LAA – left atrial area; LAEF – left atrial ejection fraction; V max – maximal volume of the left atrium; V min – minimal volume of the left atrium; preA volume – volume of the left atrium at start of P wave on ECG. Variables in the table are described with a percentage or with the median and interquartile range. **Conclusion**: This pilot study relates aIAB to the HFpEF part of the HF spectrum. Significant differences in LA structural and functional characteristics suggest that aIAB may be a useful parameter for determining a clinically relevant subgroup of HFpEF patients, however an analysis of a larger patient cohort would be required to further establish these findings.
Keywords
advanced interatrial block, heart failure, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, P wave morphology, surface electrocardiogram
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2017.357Literature
- Bayés de Luna A, Platonov P, Cosio FG, Cygankiewicz I, Pastore C, Baranowski R, et al. Interatrial blocks. A separate entity from left atrial enlargement: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol. 2012 Sep;45(5):445–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.029