Authors
- Josip Katić — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-4991-1919
- Ante Anić — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0002-6864-3999
- Toni Brešković — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-7266-2087
- Zrinka Jurišić — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0001-7583-9036
- Ante Borovina — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-2059-4259
- Tanja Kovačević — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-4252-9415
- Davor Petrović — University Hospital Centre Split, Split, Croatia — ORCID: 0000-0003-3064-3835
Keywords
radiofrequency ablation, zero fluoro, WPW, pediatrics
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2018.331Full Text
Introduction: Percutaneous catheter, mostly radiofrequency (RF), ablation for supraventricular tachycardias is an established way of treating symptomatic patients. Traditionally, essential tool for guiding intracardiac catheter manipulation was X ray fluoroscopy. The risks of exposing patients to ionizing, X ray, radiation are well known, and are of particular concern in pediatric cases or cases involving pregnant women. Recently, with the help of electroanatomical (3D), mapping systems, a possibility to perform these procedures without the use of X ray fluoroscopy, so called «zero fluoro», emerged. ( 1 ) Case report: This is a case report with an overview of some intraprocedural aspects of «zero fluoro» RF ablation procedure performed at University Hospital Centre Split in 12-year-old with the diagnosis of WPW syndrome (symptomatic SVT episodes with delta wave in native ECG). EP study was performed via right groin venous access and diagnostic catheters inserted in coronary sinus (CS) and right ventricle without the use of X ray. Orthodromic AVRT (atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia) was easily inducible and decision was made to proceed with the RF ablation with the intention of maintain «zero fluoro» principle. Single 40W RF application at proximal CS using contact force catheter and reaching the Lesion Size Index of around 7 abolished permanently accessory pathway conduction. Overall procedure time was 51 minutes, including 20 minutes waiting period for AP recovery. No complications occurred and the ECG the day after the procedure had shown no signs of anterograde AP conduction. Conclusion : Zero fluoro approach to RF ablation in patients with WPW syndrome is feasible. It should be preferred approach in vulnerable population such as pediatric cases or cases involving pregnant women.